Updated 22 September 2026 | Market benchmarks dated 17 September; carrier advisories updated through 18 September 2026
Short answer: Ocean freight rates have not quadrupled on every global trade lane. Particularly sharp pressure is currently visible in Far East–US spot markets. Xeneta’s market average for the Far East to the US East Coast reached USD 11,259 per 40-foot container on 17 September 2026—up 324.7% from 28 February, or approximately 4.25 times the pre-Hormuz-crisis level.
Higher bunker costs, security risks, alternative routing, port congestion and carrier capacity management are making rates and vessel space more volatile. Importers and exporters should therefore avoid using a previous booking’s price as the budget for a new shipment without revalidation.
Rates are rising rapidly on some trades—especially the Far East to the United States—but the increase is not uniform across the global market.
An FEU (Forty-foot Equivalent Unit) represents one 40-foot container. A TEU (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit) represents one 20-foot container. Freight indices can show different numbers because they use different datasets, methodologies, port pairs and rate inclusions.
Xeneta reported that the Far East–US East Coast average was still 11.2% below its COVID-era record, while the US West Coast average was 17.9% below its previous peak. A new record is therefore possible, but it is a forecast—not a confirmed outcome.
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical energy chokepoint. When oil flows and vessel operations are disrupted, bunker fuel, insurance and operating costs can rise at the same time.
UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) estimates that roughly one quarter of global seaborne oil trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz. It has also reported rising tanker freight rates, war-risk insurance premiums and marine fuel costs during the disruption. These pressures can move through the wider shipping network even when a container does not transit the strait directly.
Four factors matter most:
No. The freight rate is the core transportation charge. An emergency surcharge is an additional charge applied according to a carrier’s route, equipment, contract and effective-date rules. A fourfold move in a spot-rate benchmark does not mean every emergency surcharge has risen fourfold.
Common labels include Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF), Emergency Fuel Surcharge (EFS), Emergency Bunker Surcharge (EBS), Emergency Conflict Surcharge (ECS), Peak Season Surcharge (PSS) and Operational Cost Recovery (OCR).
Recent carrier announcements illustrate the difference:
These are carrier-specific examples, not universal market tariffs. Maersk presents the figures above under Existing Ocean bookings and cargo in transit, covering specified ports in Iraq, Kuwait, Dammam and Jubail in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman except Salalah. The amount charged on an actual booking depends on origin, destination, sailing date, commodity, equipment, contract terms and regulatory requirements.
No. Rate direction varies by lane. On 17 September, Drewry reported increases from Shanghai to New York and Los Angeles, but a 5% weekly decline from Shanghai to Genoa and a 9% decline from Shanghai to Rotterdam. Freightos also observed that the most direct container disruption remained concentrated on Gulf-linked cargo, while other trades were affected indirectly by fuel costs, congestion and capacity allocation.
Shippers should therefore focus on the actual port pair and routing rather than a single global headline. A Shanghai–New York benchmark is not a quotation for Laem Chabang–Los Angeles, and an index rate is not an all-in price for every commodity or container type.
Thai shippers may face faster rate changes, shorter quote validity, uncertain space and extra costs linked to routing or transshipment. The actual impact depends on the carrier, trade lane, departure date and cargo type.
Possible effects include:
Check rate, space and routing together. A low headline price is not a good option if space is unconfirmed, the routing creates delay risk or important surcharges are excluded.
Use this eight-point checklist:
Transpo Tip: Request an all-in quotation that states the routing, validity, free time and each surcharge on a separate line. It is much more reliable for decision-making than comparing base freight alone.
Use scenarios and review the market weekly instead of setting a budget from one data point. Businesses with recurring shipments should rank cargo by urgency, separate flexible shipments from critical ones and prepare a backup carrier or route.
No. The more-than-four-times comparison applies to the Far East–US East and West Coast spot markets versus 28 February 2026 in Xeneta’s dataset. Other trades can rise less, remain flat or fall. Always check a dated benchmark for the relevant port pair.
The freight rate is the main transportation charge. An emergency fuel surcharge is an extra charge intended to recover abnormal fuel costs. War-risk, peak-season, operational-recovery and local charges may also apply, so shippers should request a complete list of inclusions and exclusions.
It can affect bunker fuel, insurance, vessel routing, port congestion and carrier capacity allocation—even if the cargo does not pass through Hormuz. The size of the impact depends on the trade lane, carrier, sailing date and cargo type.
There is no universal answer. FCL can provide more control for higher volumes, while LCL avoids paying for unused container space. Compare total landed cost, consolidation time, cut-off dates, handling and delay risk before choosing.
Start with rate validity and inclusions, then verify space and equipment. Next, check routing, transshipment, ETD/ETA, free time, demurrage and detention, destination costs and cargo-insurance conditions. Do not confirm a booking from the headline rate alone.
In a market that can change every week, the right sailing must balance cost, space, transit time and route risk. Transpo Logistics can help assess Rate + Space + Routing and plan a suitable Sea Freight or Integrated Supply Chain Solution for your shipment.
Phone: +66 2 105 8651
Email: sales@transpologistics.com
Website: www.transpologistics.com
Note: The figures in this article are market references and examples from carrier advisories, not quotations. Rates and conditions can change. Always reconfirm the latest details before booking.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide content and advertisements that may interest you, to give you a better experience on our service. If you continue using our website without adjusting any settings, we understand that you consent to accept cookies on our website. Click to see more information